🚨💣 “State Capture Allegations: General Khumalo Grilled by MPs Breytenbach and Sangoni – The Truth Uncovered!”

The atmosphere in the parliamentary chamber was charged with tension as MP Breytenbach took her turn to question General Khumalo.

“Your time starts now,” she declared, setting the stage for a critical examination of Khumalo’s leadership and the integrity of the SAPS.

“General, good afternoon,” she began, her tone firm yet measured.

It was clear that the MPs were not there to mince words; they sought clarity and accountability regarding the troubling allegations surrounding Khumalo and his department.

Breytenbach wasted no time diving into the heart of the matter.

“You appointed Dao Muela, a civilian with an engineering background, to the rank of brigadeer.

Why did you do that?” she asked pointedly.

Khumalo’s response was swift, deflecting responsibility by stating that the national commissioner made the appointment.

However, Breytenbach pressed on, asking if he was happy with the decision.

“Very happy,” Khumalo replied, asserting that Muela met the necessary qualifications.

The exchange highlighted the growing concern over appointments within the SAPS and whether they were based on merit or favoritism.

The inquiry quickly escalated when Breytenbach brought up a controversial acquisition: “There was a 22 million rand boutique hotel acquisition by crime intelligence.

Why?” Khumalo’s answer was evasive, citing legal restrictions on discussing the matter publicly.

This response drew sharp criticism from Breytenbach, who accused him of hiding behind legal loopholes.

“That’s been a very, very convenient space for you to hide in,” she remarked, underscoring her frustration with his lack of transparency.

As the questioning continued, Breytenbach demanded to know what Khumalo had done to reform crime intelligence since taking office.

“Tell me three things you’ve done to reform it,” she challenged.

Khumalo listed initiatives aimed at aligning the division with SAPS priorities and addressing capacitation issues, but the MPs were not satisfied.

“How many people that are compromised have you fired?” Breytenbach pressed, seeking concrete evidence of accountability.

Khumalo estimated that around 30 individuals had been dismissed, but the lack of specificity left many questions unanswered.

It was then that MP Sangoni took the floor, expressing gratitude for Khumalo’s presence despite previous health issues.

“General Khumalo, are you involved in a project of state capture?” Sangoni asked directly, a question that hung heavily in the air.

Khumalo’s response was a mix of acknowledgment and denial.

“If the question is in reference to the state capture report, I will say yes because we are implementing the recommendations related to the division.

But in terms of me being involved in capturing the state, it’s a big no,” he asserted, attempting to distance himself from the allegations.

However, Sangoni pressed further, referencing testimony from Advocate Andrea Johnson, who had alleged that Khumalo was a key player in a project akin to state capture.

“What would be your response to that, General?” he asked pointedly.

Khumalo vehemently disagreed with the allegations, framing the charges against him as baseless and rooted in misunderstandings of his role in the selection process for appointments.

The tension mounted as Sangoni inquired about the ongoing investigations and whether there was any evidence beyond the labor-related issues at hand.

Khumalo maintained that the case against him was purely a labor matter, despite the implications of state capture swirling around his testimony.

“There is nothing else that talks to fraud or corruption,” he insisted, but his words did little to quell the skepticism among the MPs.

As the questioning continued, the narrative shifted to the broader implications of corruption within the SAPS.

Sangoni brought up concerns about the integrity of the criminal justice system, highlighting allegations of judicial corruption that had been leveled against the SAPS.

“What has been done there?” he asked, seeking clarity on the steps being taken to address these serious claims.

Khumalo acknowledged the existence of suspicions but emphasized that investigations were ongoing, leaving many unanswered questions about the depth of corruption within the system.

The inquiry culminated in a heated exchange regarding the relationship between Khumalo and other high-ranking officials within the SAPS.

Sangoni pressed Khumalo on his working relationship with Minister Munu and whether he had ever encountered any conflicts of interest.

The general’s responses were often vague, suggesting a strained relationship but failing to provide concrete details.

“We had not got an opportunity to really work together,” Khumalo stated, hinting at the complexities of navigating the political landscape within the SAPS.

In conclusion, the parliamentary inquiry into General Khumalo’s leadership and the allegations of state capture has unveiled a troubling landscape within the SAPS.

As MPs Breytenbach and Sangoni grilled Khumalo, the implications of their questions resonated far beyond the walls of Parliament, raising critical concerns about accountability, integrity, and the ongoing battle against corruption in South Africa.

With the stakes higher than ever, the future of law enforcement hangs in the balance, and the call for transparency and reform has never been more urgent.

As the investigation continues, the nation watches closely, eager for answers and a commitment to restoring faith in its police force.

The question remains: will the SAPS rise to the challenge and confront the shadows of corruption that threaten its very foundation?