In the age of social media, public figures, especially celebrities, are often under intense scrutiny.

Every word they say—or choose not to say—can spark widespread debate and criticism.

Recently, South African celebrities Zozibini Tunzi and Nomzamo Mbatha found themselves at the center of such discussions, with social media users coming to their defense amid criticism for not publicly commenting on pressing political and social issues in South Africa.

 

The controversy began when a Twitter user questioned whether Zozibini Tunzi and Nomzamo Mbatha had spoken out about the country’s political issues.

This question ignited a wave of responses, many defending the two women for their silence.

Fans and commentators argued that expecting celebrities to voice opinions on complex political matters is unreasonable and unfair.

 

Zozibini Tunzi, former Miss Universe, and Nomzamo Mbatha, a respected actress and humanitarian, are admired globally for their talents and contributions.

However, in South Africa’s politically charged climate, public figures often face pressure to take a stand on national issues.

The question raised on Twitter reflected a broader expectation that celebrities should be vocal advocates for change.

 

One of the main reasons cited for Zozibini and Nomzamo’s silence is the potential backlash celebrities face when they engage in political discourse.

Social media users highlighted that public figures who express political opinions often become targets of criticism, cancel culture, or even threats.

This environment can be hostile and damaging to their careers and personal lives.

 

Celebrities rely heavily on their public image and fan support to sustain their careers.

When they take a political stance that conflicts with segments of their audience, they risk alienating fans and losing endorsement deals or other income sources.

For globally recognized figures like Zozibini and Nomzamo, maintaining a neutral stance can be a strategic choice to protect their brand and livelihood.

 

Another significant factor is the global nature of their careers.

Both Zozibini Tunzi and Nomzamo Mbatha have ambitions and professional engagements beyond South Africa.

Engaging in local political debates could complicate their international image and opportunities.

Social media defenders argue that these women are focused on building legacies that transcend national borders.

Their silence on South African political issues is not apathy but a calculated decision to prioritize their career growth and global influence.

They are seen as role models who want to maintain broad appeal and avoid getting entangled in divisive local politics.

 

The debate also sheds light on the broader issue of societal expectations placed on celebrities.

Many people expect public figures to be activists and spokespersons for social justice, political reform, and community issues.

While some celebrities embrace this role, others prefer to focus on their craft and personal lives.

 

Critics often forget that celebrities are individuals with their own beliefs and boundaries.

They are not obligated to share their political opinions publicly, especially when doing so could jeopardize their safety or career.

Several social media users emphasized that it is unfair to expect celebrities to represent the views of an entire nation or to be constantly engaged in political activism.

Cancel culture plays a significant role in why some celebrities choose silence over vocal activism.

In South Africa, as in many parts of the world, public opinion can be swift and unforgiving.

Celebrities who express unpopular opinions or support controversial causes risk being “cancelled” — meaning boycotted or publicly shamed to the extent that their career suffers.

 

Social media defenders pointed out that in the current climate, celebrities must navigate a minefield of public expectations and potential backlash.

This reality forces many to carefully consider when and how to speak out, often opting for caution and discretion.

 

An important perspective raised by supporters is that celebrities are also human beings entitled to the same rights as ordinary citizens, including the right to remain silent.

Just as many people choose not to engage publicly in political debates for personal or safety reasons, celebrities might also prefer to stay quiet.

 

This argument challenges the notion that silence equals indifference or lack of concern.

It reminds the public that not everyone feels comfortable or safe sharing their political views openly, and that respect for personal boundaries is essential.

Many social media users also highlighted the positive ways Zozibini Tunzi and Nomzamo Mbatha contribute to society beyond political commentary.

Both women are involved in various humanitarian efforts and use their platforms to inspire and uplift others.

 

By focusing on their careers, charitable work, and global advocacy, they continue to make meaningful impacts without necessarily engaging in political controversies.

Their supporters argue that this approach allows them to build lasting legacies and influence positive change in different spheres.

 

The situation faced by Zozibini Tunzi and Nomzamo Mbatha illustrates the tricky balance celebrities must maintain in today’s digital and political landscape.

On one hand, there is a growing demand for public figures to use their influence for social good and political activism.

On the other, there is the very real risk of backlash, career damage, and personal stress.

 

For many celebrities, the choice to remain silent on certain issues is a strategic and protective one.

It allows them to continue their work, maintain broad support, and avoid the pitfalls of public controversy.

 

Personally, many agree with the majority opinion that celebrities should not be forced into political roles.

While activism is commendable, it should be a personal choice rather than an expectation.

Celebrities have diverse backgrounds, beliefs, and priorities, and their silence should not be mistaken for apathy.

 

The broader implication of this debate is a call for more nuanced understanding of the roles celebrities play in society.

They can be entertainers, role models, advocates, and entrepreneurs — but they are not obligated to fulfill all these roles simultaneously.

The defense of Zozibini Tunzi and Nomzamo Mbatha by social media users highlights the complexities celebrities face when navigating public expectations and political engagement.

Their choice to remain silent on South Africa’s political issues is seen by many as a reasonable and strategic decision aimed at preserving their careers and personal well-being.

 

As fans and observers, it is important to respect their choices and recognize that activism can take many forms.

Whether through public statements or quiet contributions behind the scenes, celebrities like Zozibini and Nomzamo continue to inspire and influence positively in their own ways.

 

In a world where every word is scrutinized, sometimes silence is the wisest and most powerful statement a public figure can make.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.