In a startling and deeply personal affidavit submitted during the highly publicized Diddy trial, Jennifer Lopez (J.Lo) has shared a candid and haunting testimony about her involvement in a youth dance program she created in 2005.
The six-page statement, submitted voluntarily and under protective court motion, sheds light on a dark undercurrent behind the scenes of the entertainment industry—one that Lopez claims she tried to shield young girls from but ultimately could not fully protect.
Jennifer Lopez’s statement begins with no formal introduction or legal counsel present, underscoring the rawness and sincerity of her account.
She recalls launching a summer dance intensive in Los Angeles aimed at underrepresented girls—an initiative born out of her desire for something “smaller, something honest” amid her booming career in film and fragrance.
The program was designed as a sanctuary rather than a spectacle.
Lopez personally funded the studio space through a third party, hand-selecting girls from open auditions without agents or managers—just raw talent and energy.
The focus was on presence, not performance.
No glam teams, no cameras, no distractions—just the girls and the music.
Despite Lopez’s efforts to keep the program pure and protected, the attention it attracted soon took a sinister turn.
Initially, a corporate sponsorship proposal arrived anonymously from “Combmes Enterprises,” a company affiliated with Diddy.
The offer promised full funding, wardrobe, press coverage, and mentorship opportunities.
But Lopez’s instincts told her something was wrong.
She noticed the language in the proposal emphasized “observational access” and “talent development” that felt less like support and more like surveillance.
It wasn’t a partnership; it was a pipeline.
The company wanted to watch the girls, to have proximity without transparency.
Lopez refused the offer outright, determined to preserve the sanctity of her movement.
After rejecting the sponsorship, Lopez observed troubling signs that her program was being infiltrated.
Unfamiliar stylists and scouts appeared uninvited, attempting to gain access under false pretenses.
Girls in the program began appearing on casting lists for projects they never auditioned for, suggesting they were being watched and assessed without their knowledge.
Lopez realized that those behind the sponsorship proposal were already watching the girls covertly.
She describes this realization as a moment she “couldn’t unsee” and “couldn’t forget.
” In response, she shut the program down abruptly, canceling the final showcase and refunding remaining funds.
She wanted the movement to disappear quietly, to protect the girls from further exploitation.
Following the closure of the dance intensive, Lopez’s career faced unexpected setbacks.
Projects she had been developing were quietly canceled or postponed without explanation.
Collaborators distanced themselves, with some signing NDAs with Combmes-affiliated entities, effectively severing ties.
Lopez received cryptic messages—an anonymous note warning her that “every door you lock means someone else opens it first,” and a blank sheet of paper with faint erased writing stating, “You don’t have to speak to be loud.
” These ominous communications underscored the power and reach of the forces she had confronted.
A pivotal moment came when Lopez received a call from an industry insider connected to Combmes Enterprises.
The caller dismissed the sponsorship letter as mere optics and insisted the program didn’t need funding but “access”—to watch the girls without interference.
Lopez asked directly if this involved minors, and the reply was chilling: it was about silence, not age.
The best subjects were those who didn’t ask questions, who simply wanted to be seen.
This revelation stripped away any remaining illusions about the true intent behind the sponsorship offer.
The next morning, Lopez’s assistant found a white envelope on her car windshield containing a typed list of first names—girls from the program—marked with statuses like “in progress,” “ready,” and “muted.
” Lopez interpreted this as a readiness report, evidence that the girls had been cataloged and monitored as potential talent for exploitation.
Recognizing the danger, Lopez decisively ended the program to prevent further harm, though she later learned that some girls had still been approached for other projects after the camp’s closure.
Seventeen years later, Lopez received an anonymous email from someone who had worked on the sponsorship proposal.
The sender confirmed that despite the camp’s closure, some girls had been invited to participate in other projects linked to the same network.
One girl accepted and has since left dancing, a fact that deeply affected Lopez.
This email, traced back to a now-defunct Combmes consultant tied to related investigations, reinforced Lopez’s belief that shutting down the camp was not enough to stop the exploitation pipeline.
Lopez emphasizes that she never intended to testify or speak publicly about these events.
Her affidavit was handwritten, unedited, and submitted voluntarily to the court as part of the evidence in the ongoing investigation into Diddy and his associates.
She writes poignantly about her role as a “doorway” for these girls—trusted by them but manipulated by those seeking to exploit them.
She admits with sorrow, “I didn’t stop them, but I didn’t help them either.”
Jennifer Lopez’s testimony is a powerful statement about the complexities of power, exploitation, and silence in the entertainment industry.
It reveals how even well-intentioned efforts to protect vulnerable young talent can be undermined by predatory practices hidden behind the guise of mentorship and opportunity.
Her decision to break her silence after nearly two decades highlights the importance of speaking out against abuse and complicity, even when it comes at personal and professional cost.
This affidavit serves as a stark reminder of the dark realities that can lurk beneath the glamour of show business.
It calls on industry leaders, parents, and communities to be vigilant and protective of young artists, ensuring that spaces meant for growth and creativity are not co-opted for exploitation.
Lopez’s story also underscores the necessity of transparency, consent, and accountability in talent development programs, particularly those involving minors.
Jennifer Lopez’s testimony in the Diddy trial offers a rare and courageous glimpse into the hidden dangers faced by young performers.
Her narrative of creating a safe space, fighting against covert exploitation, and ultimately being forced to shut down her program is both heartbreaking and instructive.
As the trial continues, her affidavit adds a critical voice to the ongoing investigation, reminding us all of the responsibility to protect the vulnerable and to hold powerful entities accountable.
Lopez’s final words resonate deeply: she wants her silence off the record, signaling a commitment to truth and justice that transcends fear and silence.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
