In a recent candid conversation with veteran broadcaster JJ Tabane on the show *Power to Truth*, Julius Malema, the fiery leader of South Africa’s Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), spoke about the recent high-profile resignations within his party, notably that of Mbuyiseni Ndlozi, and the broader questions surrounding leadership and stability within the movement.
The interview comes amid intense speculation and swirling rumors about internal strife within the EFF, following the departures of several senior figures including Floyd Shivambu and Dalpu Babes, and most recently Dr.Bu Andi.
These exits have sparked discussions about whether the party is facing a crisis or simply undergoing a natural process of renewal.
Malema revealed that he first learned of Ndlozi’s resignation while abroad on holiday with his wife.
The news came via a message from the party’s Secretary-General, but Malema admitted he had not been privy to any prior discussions or the reasons behind the decision.
“I never had that discussion with him,” Malema said, emphasizing that he was caught off guard by the resignation.
When asked about Ndlozi’s absence from the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) hearings and whether there was any directive from the party to stay away, Malema was clear: “No, there’s no such communication.
He just voluntarily didn’t come.
” He suggested that any questions about Ndlozi’s whereabouts or motivations should be directed to Ndlozi himself, as Malema said he did not know the backstory.
JJ Tabane pressed Malema on the implications of losing such a prominent member who had recently been promoted within the party ranks.
Malema responded by framing the EFF as a large and dynamic organization with over a million members, where no individual is indispensable.
“We are replaceable,” he said bluntly.
“We contribute now and we’re important now, but when we are done, it’s finished.”
This perspective highlights Malema’s emphasis on collective leadership and the idea that the party’s mission transcends any single personality.
He welcomed debate on leadership qualities but declined to speculate on Ndlozi’s personal reasons for leaving.
Malema also addressed the role of Floyd Shivambu, the party’s Deputy President, who has also been at the center of recent turmoil.
Malema disclosed that he had visited Shivambu at his home immediately after his resignation, aiming to create a comfortable space for an open conversation.
Despite this effort, Shivambu reportedly described his resignation as a “revolutionary decision” rather than a personal dispute.
Malema admitted he was not given specific reasons for Shivambu’s departure and expressed a desire to learn if any of his actions had offended party members so that he could avoid repeating mistakes.
However, he also dismissed some of the public reasons circulating as “laughable” and unworthy of serious discussion.
The departures of several senior leaders have led many observers to question the stability of the EFF.
Some see these resignations as signs of a fracturing party, while others view them as part of a natural evolution within a growing political movement.
Malema’s comments suggest a leader who is aware of challenges but confident in the party’s resilience.
His repeated assertion that “nobody is bigger than the party” underscores a commitment to institutional strength over individual egos.
While Malema sidestepped detailed explanations about the reasons behind the resignations, his interview signals that the EFF is entering a phase of renewal.
New leaders are expected to emerge, and the party’s direction will continue to be shaped by collective decisions rather than personalities.
The EFF, founded in 2013 as a radical left-wing party focused on economic emancipation and land reform, has grown rapidly to become a significant force in South African politics.
However, with growth comes growing pains, and the current shakeup may be part of the process of defining the party’s future trajectory.
The interview has sparked lively debate among supporters and critics alike.
Some praise Malema for his frankness and leadership style, while others remain skeptical about the party’s internal cohesion.
Social media discussions reflect a mix of concern, curiosity, and anticipation about how the EFF will handle this period of transition.
Julius Malema’s interview with JJ Tabane offers a rare glimpse into the inner workings of one of South Africa’s most dynamic political parties during a turbulent time.
While questions remain about the exact reasons behind the resignations of key figures like Mbuyiseni Ndlozi and Floyd Shivambu, Malema’s message is clear: the EFF is bigger than any one individual, and the movement will continue forward.
As the party navigates these changes, all eyes will be on how new leadership steps up and whether the EFF can maintain its momentum amid internal challenges.
For now, Malema’s words serve as both a reassurance to supporters and a reminder that political movements are living entities—constantly evolving and adapting to new realities.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
