The world of South African reality television has once again been stirred by a tense and emotional exchange that has left viewers shocked and deeply divided.

During the season finale of the popular show *Utando Esithembu*, Musa Mseleku made a controversial comment referring to Makhumalo as a “failure.

” This harsh remark aired on national television sparked outrage among fans and viewers, leading to widespread debate about respect, marriage, and the pressures faced by women in polygamous relationships.

Now, in a heartfelt response, Nozibele Mayaba’s husband, Skhu, has spoken out against Musa’s comment, defending his wife and addressing the broader implications of such hurtful language within marriages and communities.

 

During a particularly tense diary session on the show, Musa Mseleku, a prominent figure in South African reality TV and polygamous family life, referred to Makhumalo as a failure.

The comment was unexpected and harsh, especially given the public nature of the show and the personal relationships involved.

 

Viewers were left shocked by the bluntness of the statement, which seemed to undermine Makhumalo’s efforts and role within the family.

The remark quickly became a topic of conversation across social media platforms, with many expressing anger and disappointment at Musa’s choice of words.

 

In the midst of the public backlash, Skhu, the husband of Nozibele Mayaba—another wife in Musa Mseleku’s extended family—stepped forward to respond to the situation.

Skhu’s message was one of reflection and defense, not only for his wife but also for women who often bear the brunt of harsh judgments in polygamous and traditional settings.

He stated clearly that the harsh words used by Musa do not represent the views of all men.

Skhu emphasized that while there are things in life that can be changed, there are also things beyond one’s control, including how others perceive and judge you.

His remarks highlighted the emotional toll such public criticisms can take on individuals, especially when spoken by someone close or supposed to be supportive.

 

Skhu’s response touched on a sensitive issue that resonates deeply within many African communities: the stigma attached to childlessness in marriage.

In many cultures, having children is seen as a fundamental expectation of marriage, and failure to conceive can lead to harsh labels and social ostracism, often unfairly directed at the woman.

 

He pointed out that in black communities, when a married woman does not have children, she is frequently labeled a failure—not only by society but sometimes even by her own in-laws or husband.

This stigma adds immense pressure and emotional pain to women who are already navigating complex family dynamics.

The term “failure,” when used in this context, becomes not just a word but a wound that cuts deep into a woman’s dignity and sense of self-worth.

Skhu’s defense of his wife Nozibele was thus a stand against this damaging narrative and a call for greater compassion and understanding.

 

The situation also sheds light on the complexities of polygamous marriages, which are common in some South African cultures and are prominently featured in *Utando Esithembu*.

These relationships often come with unique challenges, including competition, jealousy, and the pressure to fulfill traditional roles such as childbearing.

 

Musa Mseleku’s comment and the subsequent reactions reveal the emotional volatility that can exist within such family structures.

While polygamy is accepted and practiced by many, it is not without its difficulties, particularly when public scrutiny and media exposure amplify private struggles.

 

Skhu’s response advocates for respect and kindness within these relationships, reminding viewers that harsh judgments and negative labels only deepen wounds rather than heal them.

This episode has sparked a wider conversation about the expectations placed on women in marriage, particularly regarding fertility and success.

It highlights the need for society to reconsider how it defines a woman’s worth and success beyond traditional markers like childbearing.

 

Skhu’s words encourage a shift towards empathy and support rather than blame and condemnation.

His call to recognize the emotional impact of such language is a timely reminder of the human side of these public family dramas.

 

The public’s reaction to both Musa’s comment and Skhu’s response has been intense.

Social media platforms have become arenas for passionate debates, with some defending Musa’s right to express frustration, while many others condemn the use of such demeaning language.

 

Supporters of Skhu and Nozibele applaud the stand against the harmful labeling of women and emphasize the importance of solidarity among spouses in polygamous families.

Others use the discussion to call for more respectful communication and conflict resolution in public and private spheres.

 

The controversy surrounding Musa Mseleku’s comment and Skhu’s response serves as a powerful reminder of the need for respect and sensitivity in discussing family issues, especially in public forums.

It calls on men and women alike to support each other through challenges rather than resorting to hurtful criticism.

 

For viewers and fans of *Utando Esithembu*, this moment is an opportunity to reflect on the realities behind the entertainment—the emotions, vulnerabilities, and cultural pressures that shape these families’ lives.

 

Nozibele Mayaba’s husband Skhu’s response to Musa Mseleku’s harsh remark is more than just a defense of his wife; it is a plea for compassion, respect, and understanding in marriages and families.

His words challenge harmful stereotypes and encourage a culture where women are valued for their whole selves, not just their ability to fulfill traditional roles.

 

As the conversation continues, it is hoped that such public dialogues will foster greater empathy and support for women facing similar challenges, both on reality TV and in real life.

Ultimately, healing and unity come from kindness and respect, values that should guide all relationships.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.