Inside the Viral Feud: Naqueeda vs. Seemah and the Social Media Storm That Won’t Die
Few online dramas have captured the attention of South Africa’s youth like the ongoing feud between influencers Naqueeda and Seemah.
What started as a single, offhand insult quickly spiraled into a full-blown spectacle, drawing in thousands of viewers, spawning endless comment threads, and igniting debates about fame, self-image, and the toxic side of internet culture.
The spark for this controversy was a video in which Seemah referred to Naqueeda as “isdenge sentombazane” – a phrase that, depending on context, can be deeply insulting. Naqueeda didn’t take the comment lying down.
She clapped back publicly, questioning Seemah’s character and motives, and the digital battleground was set.
Within hours, their followers were dissecting every word, gesture, and post, turning a personal spat into a trending topic.
Comments poured in, ranging from sharp criticism to heartfelt advice.
Many viewers condemned the use of “ugly” as an insult, labeling it a weak and outdated weapon in the arsenal of online beef. Instead, they called for both women to rise above petty name-calling and focus on personal growth.
“Using ‘ugly’ as a weapon against anyone is very weak! Let’s give them a chance to grow into wholesome women,” wrote one commenter, echoing a sentiment that would be repeated throughout the thread.
But not everyone was so forgiving. Some accused Naqueeda of being fame-hungry, suggesting she deliberately stoked the drama to boost her own relevance.
“Naaqueeda is fame hungry, to the point where she said she’d never date a guy with a low social media following.
It makes sense why she’d use Seemah’s name for relevance,” observed another user. The implication was clear: in the world of influencer culture, clout is currency, and beef is a shortcut to engagement.
Seemah herself came under fire for her reaction. Critics labeled her rude, self-absorbed, and lacking self-awareness.
“Seemah is so rude, for a girl. Wish she could be more self-aware and respect herself, man, and learn to contain her rage,” one commenter lamented.
Others urged her to ignore the haters and focus on more meaningful pursuits, warning that constant retaliation would only tarnish her reputation.
The drama didn’t stop with the main players. Thando, another influencer, and her boyfriend Dreezy got dragged into the conversation, with speculation about Dreezy’s sexuality and the impact of relationships on Thando’s promising future.
“I honestly thought Thando would be in the US or anywhere in the world schooling.
I love that she’s growing but boys delay us, maan, she’s such a promising child,” mused one follower.
Amidst the chaos, there were moments of unexpected sincerity.
A handful of commenters used the platform to share religious messages, offering prayers and reminders of Jesus Christ’s love.
These posts stood out as islands of positivity in a sea of snark and shade, but they also highlighted the eclectic nature of online communities, where faith and fandom collide.
What’s most striking about this episode is how quickly minor insults can escalate into major online events.
The feud between Naqueeda and Seemah is emblematic of a culture where personal conflicts are played out in public, magnified by the relentless churn of likes, shares, and comments.
For many young viewers, these dramas are more than entertainment – they’re lessons in reputation management, emotional intelligence, and the perils of living life online.
As the dust settles, several questions remain. Why do influencers like Naqueeda and Seemah attract so much attention for their conflicts? Is it simply a matter of relatability, or is there something deeper at play – a hunger for authenticity and drama in a curated world?
And perhaps most importantly, what does this say about the power and pitfalls of social media fame?
The answer may lie in the comment section itself. For every negative remark, there’s a call for kindness and maturity.
For every accusation of clout-chasing, there’s a reminder to focus on what really matters. In the end, the Naqueeda vs. Seemah saga is more than just a feud – it’s a reflection of the digital age, with all its messiness, contradictions, and endless capacity for reinvention.
Whether the two influencers will ever reconcile is anyone’s guess. But one thing is certain: as long as there are followers, there will be drama. And in the world of social media, reputation is always just one comment away from crisis – or comeback.
