Prophet Sooro sparks outrage with shocking claims on snake worship, charging for prayers, and controversial support for fraudulent pastors in a recent podcast interview.

Prophet Sooro has ignited a firestorm of controversy within the Christian community following his recent appearance on the Gospel Realities Podcast, where his statements on faith, theology, and morality left many listeners in disbelief.

Known for his unorthodox views, Sooro’s latest interview has sparked heated debate, as he addressed issues ranging from occult practices to charging exorbitant fees for prayer consultations.

While some listeners were intrigued by his candidness, the majority of viewers have been left questioning his spiritual integrity, ethics, and understanding of Christian doctrine.

During the interview, Prophet Sooro made several explosive claims, some of which defy traditional Christian teachings.

One of the most shocking revelations came when he admitted to once joining a church that practices snake worship, specifically mentioning Kereke ya Sepiri—a group linked to occultic rituals.

Sooro detailed his experiences in the church, describing the unusual and unsettling spiritual practices he had witnessed.

While he emphasized that he had renounced these practices, his detailed knowledge of them and the willingness to discuss their significance raised alarm among listeners.

Some even questioned whether his past involvement with such groups had any lingering influence on his current ministry.

Despite these startling revelations, Sooro defended his past actions, suggesting that his experiences with the occult had ultimately led him to a deeper understanding of deliverance and healing.

However, his insistence on the power of “grace” to redeem all actions, no matter how questionable, has led to accusations that he is enabling unethical behavior.

His actions were particularly scrutinized when he revealed that he had defended another pastor involved in fraudulent activities, justifying his support by saying that “God gives everyone grace.” Critics, however, argue that while grace is central to Christian faith, it should never be used as an excuse for unrepentant actions.

In their eyes, Sooro’s actions appeared more to be about damage control rather than promoting genuine spiritual accountability and repentance.

Another point of contention during the interview was Sooro’s view on the spiritual significance of human body parts. In a statement that left many listeners puzzled, Sooro claimed that each body part is spiritually connected to specific principalities and powers.

While he stopped short of elaborating further, he left the door open for more discussion on the topic, which some saw as an attempt to assert his spiritual authority.

Critics were quick to dismiss this idea, pointing out that it has no biblical foundation and could mislead believers into adopting potentially harmful practices.

Perhaps the most troubling part of the interview was Sooro’s admission that he charges R10,000 for personal prayer consultations.

When asked whether this fee guaranteed any specific outcomes, he deflected the question, only adding to the growing concerns about the commercialization of spirituality.

Charging for prayers has long been a divisive issue within Christian communities, with many arguing that it undermines the core principles of faith, particularly in regions where poverty is rampant.

Sooro’s decision to monetize his spiritual services left many wondering whether his ministry was driven by genuine concern for others or by a desire for personal gain.

Despite these ethical and theological concerns, Sooro’s comments regarding the name of Jesus were equally contentious. He made the claim that invoking the name of Jesus without a personal relationship with Him was ineffective.

This statement raised eyebrows, as it appeared to contradict the Christian belief in the power of Jesus’ name, regardless of one’s personal faith.

Passages like Philippians 2:9-11 affirm the universal power of Christ’s name, making Sooro’s suggestion seem incompatible with core Christian doctrine.

Many listeners expressed confusion, as the implication that faith in Christ’s name could be ineffective if not accompanied by a personal relationship undermines basic principles of Christian teaching.

Throughout the interview, Sooro made an effort to present himself as a man of deliverance, claiming that his past experiences and his controversial views were ultimately aimed at bringing people closer to spiritual healing.

However, the lack of clarity in his explanations, coupled with the contradicting nature of some of his statements, left many questioning his true motives.

One moment, he spoke of praying for individuals to become “stronger” and “more powerful,” only to backtrack moments later and clarify that he was praying for spiritual healing rather than empowerment for unethical purposes.

Such inconsistencies have left listeners in doubt about the authenticity of his teachings.

The backlash against Prophet Sooro has been swift and fierce.

Social media has been flooded with criticism, with many calling for greater accountability in the church and questioning the growing trend of self-proclaimed prophets who present unorthodox and often dangerous interpretations of scripture.

While some have defended Sooro’s right to speak openly about his faith, the majority of commenters have expressed concern over the potential harm his teachings could do to vulnerable believers.

One common refrain in the discussions has been a call for a return to traditional Christian values, with a focus on biblical truth and ethical integrity.

For some, the interview served as a stark reminder of the dangers of charismatic leaders who mix personal interpretations with scripture, creating a blend of spirituality that can be more about spectacle than substance.

As one commenter put it, “When the power of the gospel is reduced to spectacle and personal gain, it’s a dangerous road to walk.”

The controversy surrounding Prophet Sooro highlights a broader issue facing modern Christian leadership—how to balance personal revelation with adherence to biblical truth.

While Sooro’s willingness to engage with difficult and controversial topics may have earned him some support, the lack of clarity in his views and the ethical questions surrounding his practices have left many wondering whether he can continue to lead with credibility.

The church community, it seems, is divided: some see him as a visionary, while others view him as a dangerous figure, distorting faith for personal gain.

As Prophet Sooro’s story continues to unfold, the Christian community remains divided on the way forward.

While some may continue to support him, many others are calling for greater scrutiny and a return to the core values of the faith.

For Sooro to regain the trust of believers, his actions must align more closely with biblical principles, and his teachings must be grounded in scriptural truth rather than personal revelation or spiritual theatrics.

Only time will tell whether Prophet Sooro will navigate this controversy successfully or become a cautionary tale of the dangers of spiritual manipulation.