Monty Nkosi Exposes King Mswati’s Shocking Role in Ukuthwala – The Dark Truth Behind Missing Children
Monty Nkosi’s recent statements have sent shockwaves through social media and communities concerned with human rights and children’s welfare in Eswatini.
With a heavy heart and fierce determination, Nkosi accused King Mswati III of being complicit in the disappearance and exploitation of children through the traditional practice known as Ukuthwala.
Ukuthwala, historically a customary practice involving arranged marriages, has increasingly been criticized for being used to abduct vulnerable children—mostly girls—and force them into marriages or exploitative situations.
Nkosi’s allegations suggest that this practice is not only tolerated but actively facilitated by those in power, including the monarch himself.
Nkosi’s words were raw and filled with pain.
He described how children, innocent and vulnerable, are being “cut” away—taken forcibly as if they were mere objects or commodities.
He likened the act to taking a “mcimba” (a traditional basket), emphasizing the callousness with which these children are treated.
Nkosi’s outrage centers on the fact that these acts are happening under the watch of the highest authority, with no regard for the children’s wellbeing or future.
He called out the illogical and cruel nature of the practice, questioning how such actions could lead to success, power, or wealth for the nation.
Instead, he sees it as a destructive force that tears families apart and perpetuates suffering.
Nkosi urged people to use common sense and logic rather than blindly following harmful traditions or powerful figures who exploit others.
The accusations extend beyond cultural critique to a direct political indictment.
Nkosi highlighted how the leadership, including the king, fails to protect its people and instead contributes to their suffering.
He mentioned the disappearance and death of children throughout the country, lamenting the lack of accountability and justice.
Nkosi also referenced the broader social consequences of such abuses, including the impact on education and employment.
He contrasted the plight of children lost to Ukuthwala with the achievements of Eswatini’s youth who succeed abroad, such as in Los Angeles, where some have risen to prominent positions like mayor.
This stark contrast underscores the wasted potential caused by harmful traditional practices.
The emotional intensity of Nkosi’s message is undeniable.
He pleaded for an end to the silence and complicity surrounding Ukuthwala, urging the community and leaders alike to recognize the harm being done.
He condemned the king’s disregard for his people and called for truth and justice to prevail.
Nkosi’s revelations come at a time when global attention on child rights and protection is growing.
His exposure of Ukuthwala’s dark reality in Eswatini adds a critical voice to the fight against child exploitation and abuse.
It challenges cultural norms and demands that tradition not be used as a shield for human rights violations.
The call to action is clear: stop the practice of forcibly taking children, protect the vulnerable, and hold those responsible accountable—no matter their status or power.
Nkosi’s courage in speaking out may inspire others to break their silence and demand change.
In conclusion, Monty Nkosi’s powerful exposure of King Mswati’s alleged role in Ukuthwala shines a harsh light on a hidden crisis in Eswatini.
It reveals the urgent need for reform, protection of children’s rights, and a reckoning with those who perpetuate harm under the guise of culture and tradition.
The nation stands at a crossroads—will it choose to protect its children or continue down a path of silence and suffering?
