South Africa finds itself at a critical crossroads.
The ruling African National Congress (ANC), once hailed as the liberator of the nation, now faces unprecedented scrutiny and criticism from all corners of society.
Among the most vocal critics is Prince Mashele, a prominent political commentator and analyst, whose recent interview on the SMWX platform delivered a blistering assessment of President Cyril Ramaphosa, the ANC leadership, and the state of governance in the country.

Mashele’s remarks are not mere political rhetoric; they reflect deep frustrations shared by many South Africans who witness the gradual erosion of public trust, the rise of corruption, and the collapse of essential services.
This article unpacks Mashele’s key points, offering readers insight into the challenges confronting South Africa’s democracy and the urgent need for transformative leadership.

Prince Mashele did not mince words when he described the ANC as “African National Criminals.”
This provocative label underscores a harsh reality: the party that once symbolized hope and freedom has become synonymous with corruption and self-interest.

Mashele highlighted how the ANC’s leadership, including figures such as President Ramaphosa and other senior officials, have failed to uphold the principles of good governance.
Instead, they have engaged in practices that enrich a select few while the majority of South Africans suffer from poverty, unemployment, and decaying infrastructure.

One of the most damning accusations leveled by Mashele is the allegation that Ramaphosa and his allies are “partners in crime.”
This phrase captures the perceived complicity within the ruling elite, where political power is wielded not to serve the people but to protect vested interests.

South Africa has seen a proliferation of commissions of inquiry, often hailed as tools to uncover corruption and restore accountability.
However, Mashele argues that these commissions have become nothing more than “smokescreens” designed to distract the public and delay meaningful action.

He pointed to the Madlanga Commission and others as examples where investigations drag on without tangible outcomes.
According to Mashele, these inquiries serve the interests of the powerful by giving the illusion of accountability while allowing perpetrators to avoid real consequences.

This critique resonates with widespread public skepticism.
Many South Africans feel that commissions are used to buy time and manage political damage rather than to deliver justice.

Among the scandals shaking the Ramaphosa administration, the Phala Phala farm incident stands out.
Mashele described it as “an open act of criminality,” highlighting the alleged cover-ups and mishandling of the investigation.

The Phala Phala scandal has become emblematic of the broader issues of corruption and impunity within the ANC government.
It raises serious questions about the integrity of the presidency and the rule of law in South Africa.

Mashele’s prediction that Ramaphosa could eventually face jail time for his involvement in such scandals sends a strong message about the potential consequences of unchecked corruption.

Mashele’s critique extends beyond individual scandals to the systemic failures of governance.
He lamented the “unguided drift” of the state, where institutions meant to serve the public interest are weakened or captured by political elites.

The decline of essential services, from water supply in Johannesburg’s Sandton area to crumbling public infrastructure nationwide, reflects the broader dysfunction.
Mashele contrasted the governance of Cape Town under Helen Zille with Johannesburg’s decline, suggesting that competent leadership can make a difference even within South Africa’s complex political context.

The failure of leadership is also evident in the handling of intelligence services and presidential briefings.
Mashele accused the current administration of protecting elites through “leave of absence” arrangements that amount to sabbaticals rather than genuine accountability measures.

In his analysis, Mashele compared the eras of former presidents Thabo Mbeki, Jacob Zuma, and Cyril Ramaphosa.
He argued that despite differences in style, the underlying issues of corruption and poor governance persist across administrations.

Mashele’s blunt assessment that “Ramaphosa and Zuma are not different” challenges popular narratives that portray Ramaphosa as a reformer.
This perspective raises critical questions about the depth of change within the ANC and its capacity to self-correct.

The concept of a National Dialogue and the formation of a Government of National Unity (GNU) have been floated as potential ways to address South Africa’s political crises.
Mashele remains skeptical, viewing these initiatives as unlikely to resolve the fundamental problems.

He expressed concern that such dialogues often become platforms for political theater rather than genuine engagement with citizens’ needs.
The GNU, in his view, risks entrenching the status quo by involving the same actors responsible for current failures.

Mashele warned about the fading of civic activism and national pressure, which are vital for holding leaders accountable.
He emphasized that without active citizen engagement, corruption and mismanagement will continue unchecked.

The decline in public activism also reduces the pressure on political parties to deliver on promises and uphold democratic values.

Looking ahead, Mashele made a bold prediction that by 2029, the ANC could fall below 20% in electoral support.
This forecast reflects growing disillusionment and the potential for significant political realignment in South Africa.

Such a decline would have profound implications for the country’s political landscape, possibly opening space for new parties and movements to emerge.

Throughout the interview, Mashele emphasized what real leadership should look like:
Accountable, transparent, and committed to serving the people rather than personal or factional interests.

He called for leaders who can restore faith in the state, rebuild institutions, and prioritize the welfare of all South Africans.

Prince Mashele’s candid and uncompromising critique serves as a wake-up call for South Africa.
His insights highlight the urgent need for transformative change in governance and political culture.

The challenges facing the country are immense, but they are not insurmountable.
With honest leadership, active civic participation, and a commitment to justice, South Africa can reclaim its promise as a vibrant democracy.

Mashele’s words resonate beyond partisan politics; they speak to the aspirations of millions who seek a better future.
As the nation grapples with its current crises, the time for reflection and action is now.