Floyd Shivambu’s Political Downfall: The Shocking Scandal Rocking South Africa’s MK Party

Floyd Shivambu’s name has been trending across social media and news outlets, but not for reasons he would have hoped.

His political career has taken a sharp nosedive, culminating in his removal as Secretary General of the MK party on June 3, 2025.

The official reason cited by the party was his controversial visit to fugitive pastor Shepherd Bushiri in Malawi—a move widely criticized as inappropriate for a political leader.

However, Shivambu claims his dismissal stems from a fabricated intelligence report accusing him of plotting to overthrow MK party leader Jacob Zuma.

Adding to the bizarre nature of the scandal are rumors that Shivambu was accused of attempting to acquire supernatural powers to make people “disappear,” a claim he vehemently denied.

Social media users mocked the allegations, questioning the judgment of a political leader who would associate with a fugitive pastor.

This incident has only deepened the perception that Floyd Shivambu is embroiled in chaos and controversy, damaging his reputation further.

Compounding his troubles, former MK party leaders, including Julius Malema, openly criticized Shivambu’s political ambitions.

Malema dismissed Shivambu’s plans to form a new party as futile and warned him to abandon the idea.

Despite this, Shivambu announced intentions to hold public consultations in July 2025 to explore the formation of a new political party ahead of the 2026 elections.

He framed this move as a response to internal issues within the MK party, emphasizing his loyalty to MK while ruling out rejoining the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), which he co-founded with Malema, calling it a “cult.”

The tension between Shivambu and his former allies has been palpable.

Malema’s scathing remarks highlighted the bitter fallout from Shivambu’s departure from the EFF and his strained relationship with MK party leadership.

Shivambu, meanwhile, remains defiant, refusing to resign from MK despite the party’s clear desire to distance itself from him.

His social media presence reflects his determination to fight back against what he describes as political sabotage and corruption within the party.

One of the most explosive moments came during Shivambu’s June 19, 2025, press conference, where he made serious allegations of financial misconduct within the MK party.

He accused senior leaders of embezzling approximately 7 million rand monthly from party funds and claimed his ousting was retaliation for exposing this corruption.

Shivambu also criticized Jacob Zuma, alleging the MK leader was surrounded by “political scoundrels” exploiting the party for personal gain.

These revelations have polarized public opinion.

Some see Shivambu as a whistleblower bravely exposing corruption, while others view him as a divisive figure whose actions have destabilized the party.

The MK party officially condemned the press conference as unauthorized and distanced itself from Shivambu’s statements.

Meanwhile, social media reactions range from support for Shivambu’s transparency to calls for his immediate expulsion.

Despite the turmoil, Shivambu continues to engage actively with his supporters, using social media platforms to outline his future plans and advocate for transparency in politics.

His resilience has earned him praise from some quarters, who admire his refusal to back down amid intense pressure.

Yet, his political future remains uncertain as he navigates the precarious balance between loyalty to MK and his ambitions to establish a new political force.

The internal strife within the MK party reflects broader challenges facing South African politics, where factionalism, corruption allegations, and leadership battles are common.

Shivambu’s saga underscores the difficulties of maintaining unity within political movements and highlights the personal costs of public life.

As the MK party grapples with these issues, the upcoming 2026 elections loom large, with potential shifts in power dynamics.

Observers are closely watching how this drama unfolds, as it could reshape the political landscape.

Shivambu’s next moves—whether to successfully launch a new party or reconcile with existing factions—will be critical.

For now, his position remains precarious, caught between political exile and a fight for relevance.

In conclusion, Floyd Shivambu’s recent troubles illustrate the volatile nature of South African politics and the high stakes involved in leadership disputes.

His story is a cautionary tale about the consequences of political missteps, internal party conflict, and the struggle for power.

Whatever happens next, it is clear that Shivambu’s journey will continue to captivate and divide public opinion for months to come.