The internet is abuzz with the latest drama between South African figures Tollasmo and Skotheni, with heated exchanges leaving many questioning the ethics of public disputes.

What began as a discussion on cultural practices quickly spiraled into a deeply personal conflict, drawing reactions from fans and critics alike.

The controversy began when Tollasmo appeared on a popular podcast and made comments linking traditional healing practices to the passing of Skotheni’s child.

His remarks suggested that using certain traditional medicines (miti) during pregnancy could negatively impact a child’s health, allegedly implying this could have played a role in Skotheni’s loss.

Unsurprisingly, the comments did not sit well with Skotheni or her supporters.

Her partner, Mday, immediately took to social media to issue a heartfelt statement condemning Tollasmo’s words as “reckless and inhumane.

” He emphasized the pain that his wife continues to endure and stressed that no grieving parent should be subjected to such accusations.

Mday’s response was widely praised for its respectful and composed tone, which sharply contrasted with what came next.

While Mday chose to address the issue with diplomacy, Skotheni took an entirely different approach.

In a video response, she launched into a tirade filled with insults aimed at Tollasmo, making crude comments about his appearance and hygiene.

She questioned why people continue to attack her by bringing up her child’s passing and insisted that Tollasmo had no right to speak on such a personal matter.

Her aggressive reaction sparked debate, with some supporting her emotional outburst and others criticizing her for lowering the discourse to insults.

Many pointed out that while she had every right to be upset, her approach only fueled further negativity.

In an attempt to defuse the situation, Tollasmo later issued a public apology but maintained his stance that pregnant women should not use traditional medicines.

He claimed that he had reached out to Skotheni privately, but she responded with hostility.

In a follow-up statement, he expressed frustration at being continuously attacked and even went as far as to say he was “rebuking” Skotheni in the name of Jesus.

This only escalated tensions further.

While this feud is making headlines for its entertainment value, it also raises serious questions about public discourse and ethical boundaries.

Should public figures be more mindful of their words, especially when speaking about someone’s loss? Should personal disputes be handled offline rather than being played out for millions to see?

One clear takeaway from this ordeal is the importance of sensitivity when discussing deeply personal topics.

Losing a child is an unimaginable tragedy, and using such an event as a point of discussion—even if unintentionally—can cause immense pain.

On the other hand, public figures also have a responsibility to communicate effectively, and resorting to personal insults only detracts from the real issues at hand.

The dust appears to be settling on this controversy, but it serves as a lesson in the power of words and the consequences of online feuds.

While both parties have valid grievances, their approaches to resolving conflict could not be more different.

Whether this drama will fade away or reignite in another public spectacle remains to be seen, but for now, it stands as yet another cautionary tale about the volatile nature of internet disputes.